Page 6 - reflections_dyslipidaemia_newsletter5_2023
P. 6

REFLECTIONS
                                                                                                                   Dyslipidaemia
     Dyslipidaemia Global Newsletter #5 2023


     Clinically, low HDL-C remains an important risk marker for
     increased risk of ASCVD. For patients with extremely high          CLINICAL PEARLS FROM THE FACULTY           Dyslipidaemia
     HDL-C, the documented increased risk of infectious disease and
     all-cause mortality could inform patients and physicians on the
     negative prognostic consequences of high HDL-C. The authors
     suggest that future efforts to pharmacologically modulate HDL
     should focus on HDL function rather than HDL-C levels and
     other clinical indications besides ASCVD.



              CLICK HERE
              FOR THE LINK TO FULL ARTICLE
                                                                           WATCH
                                                                           DR. WELNICKI DISCUSS THE
                                                                           CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF HDL TO
                                                                           EVERYDAY PRACTICE.



     TREATMENT

     Great debate: Lipid-lowering therapies should be guided by vascular imaging
     rather than by circulating biomarkers.

     Tokgozoglu L, et al. Eur Heart J. 2023 Jul 1;44(25):2292-2304.

     Current guidelines recommend initiation and intensification of lipid-lowering therapies based on LDL-C levels of the individual, along
     with total cardiovascular risk level. With an increasing number of lipid-lowering therapies, the authors explain that it is important to
     better understand in whom, when, and how to administer these therapies optimally. In this review article, the authors present the
     evidence for and against the statement that lipid-lowering therapies should be guided by vascular imaging rather than by circulating
     biomarkers.

     On the Pro side, the authors suggest that identifying primary prevention patients with the greatest benefit of use of more intensive
     lipid lowering remains uncertain and that vascular imaging, such as computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to calculate
     coronary calcium scores may be beneficial. Non-invasive vascular imaging has the potential to identify subclinical atherosclerotic
     disease and recognize patients that may benefit from intensified therapies to reduce their cardiovascular risk. The authors review
     several studies in support of this and conclude that since an atherosclerotic plaque is what causes an ischaemic event, the ability to
     identify those plaques with imaging allows for an ideal opportunity to treat them.


     On the Con side, the authors discuss that imaging approaches are costly and that data from randomized trials are needed to
     demonstrate incremental value of vascular imaging to target therapeutic strategies for lipid lowering. Currently available biomarkers
     that are correlated with increased CV risk, such as high-sensitivity CRP, systolic BP, total cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol, are
     inexpensive to measure, can be obtained during a routine patient visit without exposure of the patient to radiation, and may be used
     in combination to further stratify moderate-risk patients who do not otherwise qualify for lipid-lowering therapies.

















          TABLE OF CONTENTS
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11